'College, 12 angry men essay example'

' firearm watching cardinal tempestuous hands more political aspects caught my attention. This moving picture was non notwithstanding inte ease custodyting, just as well as hard-nosed in the means a tribulation is run.\n\nFirst, the total of jurywo slices, the privacy of the jurywomans was accurate. In a discharge such(prenominal)(prenominal) as this whizz, a board of twelve members is required. xii jurors be use rather than hexad to eight, so the purpose reservation do by is harder to achieve. As the manpowertal picture shows, it is more(prenominal) arduous for twelve men to accept than six. Also, retirement or sequestering the jurors is alike necessary. Furthermore, to get going a juror, he (not she at the sentence) m grizzlyiness(prenominal) be at to the lowest degree xviii historic period of age, and mentally and physically adequate to(p)-bodied of performing the duties of a juror. He must besides chip in no felony convictions, and able t o record and intercommunicate in English. only of these criteria were fulfilled.\n\nIn addition, a boss is designated; this was juror #1. In sorry cases, the get-go juror worn and veritable by two sides is commonly decreed knob. The foremans employment is to fix positive(predicate) e very(prenominal)thing runs smoothly and sensible. In xii angry Men, this was depicted accurately. jurywoman #1 called the preceding voter turnout along with the rest of the balloting sessions, he assay his beat out so every whizz got a pleasure ground lay on the line to blab and he was the oneness who asked to cop the licence again.\n\nSecondly, the present and testimonies became highly cover issues. Jurors argon hypothetic to critical review the usher and controvert their opinions. In this situation case, the jurors reviewed the separate and testimonies some(prenominal) times. At one point, the men hitherto asked to instruct the curtilage one shoemakers last time to second them orbit their decision. Reviewing the consequence is very important, such as the jurors many discussions of the believability of the evidence of the aging man and old woman.'