Racism Research the Case Study of Tuskegee Syphilis Study Essay

Introduction The study of Tuskegee Syphilis study case was to find give away the extent of the untreated syphilis in urban areas and the way to stop it by carrying out a research on the affected ones which comprised of 400 men in Alabama, especially among the blacks, the USPHS conducted studies in the rural southernmost to determine the prevalence of syphilis among blacks and explore the possibilities for mass treatment (Brandt, 65).The study of Tuskegee syphilis study had it results and consequences. It was interpret and on that pointfore it was highly criticized. The results of the research were helpful since they led to finding out the root cause of the big increase of syphilis in blacks. The consequences were far worse since the participants were non informed of the actual intentions of the research because the doctors believed that they would disavow the ideas and therefore violated their human right of consent (Brandt, 66-67). It led to the death of tribe since the researches knowingly did not treat the patient even after finding out the right antibiotics for Syphilis. The consequences of the study brought about the foundation of boards and legislations to govern research and stipulate its rules for all the research to be carried out. The study also raised issuance about the professional ethics since they used human to experiment on their research and used pretense to gain their trust and it showed more of racism than medical checkup issues.The study case of the Tuskegee will not be replicable because it was carried out without the consent of the participants that is, the people being tested and therefore it violated their human rights and it was base on one race that is the blacks creating racism conflicts (Brandt, 66). The research was highly criticized and therefore it would be every hard to copy due to its extent of withholding medicine and also the regulation that are stated out apprize only allow it if the research follow them to the end.The study of the case of the Tuskegee was unethical. In each field of professionals there are rules that are set to govern the field and the professors in carrying out their duties in this case the medical ethics was not practice and this made it unethical (Brandt, 67-68). The participants in this lab experiment had the medicine to recruit the syphilis but instead their withheld it knowingly from the patient and some died a painful death and others suffered from disparate ailments. Also it was unethical since the researchers did not ask for the consent of the participants instead they gave promises and did not fulfill them and it was racial based research no whites were involved (Brandt, 27).Sociological perspective tries to explain the impacts of the study in our connection at once in the case functional perspective is the need for people to be healthy so that the society will function well. The communities in general should provide health centers to be able to treat pe ople in the society. Sociological perspectives presented in Tuskegee syphilis study sociological conflict as the one nurture from the study is based on the ethics since the research was against the ethics of research and also human rights (Brandt, 70-71). It treat the right of human beings in terms of withholding the medicine from the patients and also the issue of racism in medicine is also a major problem that needs to be eliminated. The distribution of medical choice should be distributed equally. Interactionists focus on how people learn about an illness and also the role of media and others to spreading the awareness of the illness. By interacting with one another the severest of any sickness in the society because they will be able to find a cure.ReferencesBrandt, Allan M. Racism and research the case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Hastings Center track 8.6 (1978) 21-29.Source document