Kishwar Naheed Essay

She conveys that wo workforce were unwanted and were non cargond for. In particular female infants were seen as a financial burden to an Indian family as they were discriminated from working and were non allowed to have an education. Naheed emphasises that she felt as if she was in the family for no purpose. Male infants were seen as the family gaining prosperity, they were celebrated and it was a gift to be proud of. The opening of the stanza nervy with glass immediately tells the reader that this is a luxurious place or arrogant. The word Brash is ironic as it can mean uninfected faced.The harsh vowel of the assonance helps the reader to suggest the poets anger. The allegory and alliteration of the phrase flaring ex divergeable a flag conveys the estimation that the eating house asserts itself, even in its name. The word flag suggests that the people who slew up a flag, have conquered someone elses land. This highlights the idea of when the whites steal the land of S erupt h Africa. Flaring suggests that the whites are bragging to the lot (blacks) almost their superior life style and it conveys Afrikas anger as this links to the doubling of heat utilised earlier in stanza two anger of my eyes. The fiction guard at the gatepost suggest that the restaurant is reserved exclusively for white people. The guards are threatening the plurality (blacks. ) He explains that even though on that refer is No sign displayed outside the whites only inn and Apartheid was supposed to be put to an end. The guard is replaced instead of the sign as they block the masses (blacks) from entering the haute cuisine. Therefore, Afrika gives a clear image to the reader that Apartheid still exists.In I am non that wo part Kishawar Naheed attempts to redefine the man- charr relationship and contend the situation she faces in her everyday life of exploitation and oppression. It is illustrated in the row Now it is beat for me to flower liberal. The alliteration giv es the impression that she wants to fight prickle and does not want to live restricted any much. The manner of communicate Now and cede shows when she wants to redefine the man-woman relationship. Moreover, she explains how she wants to live like. Naheed wants a life with no restrictions and for men and women to be toughened equally.The message in the poem is that men and women are not always tough equally and how there is still sexism and discrimination. In particular, women are not dominated by men and men are processed with prestige and power. The poem helps her express her thoughts and judgments. Afrikas words are obscure we know where we belong. This perhaps emphasises that the masses (blacks) know that they are discriminated from entering the inn as there is a guard at the gate post. The use of the pronoun we emphasises that he believes that his identity belongs with the masses (blacks.) The single rose on severally table contrast with the working mans cafe. As a single rose symbolises high quality life-style or perfection. It could besides mean the arrogant wealth that was amongst the mass poverty at the time. In the words My motherhood Naheed conveys that women were born to nurture and care. On the other hand, the men in her society have stolen this substantial and amazing gift from them. or else women are forced to be voiceless, obedient and were unfairly treated as servants due to the male dominance. My committal suggests that her husband and her father took away her loyalty and treated her unfairly.Naheed is aware that she has the right to achieve her loyalty again. In the fifth part stanza the poet uses the words bunny chows to convey the masses (blacks) poor lifestyle in the working mans cafe. Bunny chows was cheap at the time and a common local snack of a poor mans hamb weighr it is a stark contrast with haute cuisine. In the restaurant there are plastic tables top, this suggests the poor lifestyle the masses had. The plastic t ables top suggests that there is no tablecloth and they felt incomplete, empty and it must have been uncomfortable to eat on. skip over your fingers on your jeans gives the impression that there is nowhere to wash ones hands after eating or a tissue to brush hands. Afrika uses direct imagery to show the life of the masses (blacks. ) Kishwar suggests that women do not have self respect. This is evident in The woman on the broadside half naked. Naheed is commenting on how men view women as objects or for intimate pleasure. She wants this view to modification. The notation No, no I am not that woman emphasises that Naheed is not a woman who is obedient, subservient and does not want to block any contestations or disagreements with anything the men verbalize.The repetition of no shows that she is certain on her actions and strongly disagrees with how many women in the Asian culture are living. Afrika uses the words boy again to show that the appearance of District six brings ad venture memories of his childhood when the Apartheid system existed. He does not feel independent as he feels like a boy and believes he is following the whites like how a child is with their parents. Hands burn emphasises his anger against the system and his urge to destroy the symbol of segregation. Afrika repeats the title Nothings changed at the close of the poem.He conveys that even though Apartheid has been Abolished, the masses (blacks) are still treated inferior. The final stanza shows his anger and disappointment of the economic division amongst the whites and the masses (blacks) and conveys that the society has not changed at all. The layout of Nothings changed is set out in eight short lines in each of the six stanzas. The layout creates a sense of control as he is clear on what he is feeling and no sudden rage is introduced at any point in the poem. His anger increases gradually within each line.The poet makes his argument straight forward by emphasising his feelings in a calm manner. In the set-back stanza the use of imagery makes the reader feel as if they are in the poets shoes. This makes it clear and liberal to imagine how life was like for Tatumkhulu Afrika. This is illustrated in the words Small round hard stones click under my heels. It makes it easy to imagine the masses (blacks) unpleasant and unfortunate lifestyle. The structure of I am not that woman is informal. The layout of the stanzas do not fit in a regular pattern and none of the words rhyme with each other.The free flowing structure shows how determined Naheed is round her argument. This conveys that nobody can change the way she is and nothing will hold her back. Even by the round-eyed rules of poetry. It emphasises how infatuated she is towards emancipation. Furthermore, she is protesting about women having access to equal opportunities and rights as men and women should not be treated as if they are worthless or disempowered. It is seen in the words my loyalty. The tones between Nothings changed and I am not that woman are very different. Kishwar Naheeds tone in I am not that woman is very calm, but firm.Her steady tone conveys that she has control over what is being said by repeatedly claiming I not that woman. Tatumkhulu Afrikas tone contrasts compared to Naheeds. In Nothings changed the poet seems to be increasing his rage within each line as he sees more things that have not changed even though Apartheid was abolished. Moreover, he is feeling angry because he had not been to District six for many years. In-conclusion, I believe that Kishwar Naheed in I am not that woman argument is stronger as the poem relates more to her lifestyle, cultural beliefs and traditional values about what she has experienced as a woman herself.Naheed clearly explains that wants equality between men and women. Moreover, she does not want to live a typical lifestyle of an asian and leaves the reader in hope that there is a pass of change. However I believe that Tatumkhulu Afrika argument in Nothings changed. Is not as strong as Naheeds as he leaves the reader feeling helpless and has not attempted to change his lifestyle as much as Naheed has in nothings changed. Afrika has allowed the whites to treat the masses (blacks) unfairly because he was not as determined or eager as Naheed.He mainly just agreed how nothings changed however, Naheed believes that no one can stop or change her views. This is why I strongly believe Naheedss argument is more effective. I believe that Naheeds argument will become more powerful if the majority of women did not accept the cultural beliefs of a cringing Asian housewife and they were all determined to fight for equality. By women taking action as a group by giving their views and speaking the men whitethorn realise that women are treated unfairly, and their lifestyle may change once they have taken action.